От д-р Кирил Чуканов
Солт Лейк Сити, Юта, САЩ
February 2026
In the autumn of 1993, I presented my work at the “Cold Fusion International Conference” in Maui, Hawaii. See: Chukanov Energy articles “. CF CONF 1993 Hi – NEW PULSE GAS LOUDING COLD FUSION TECHNOLOGY, HAWAII, 1993; “Cold Fusion May Live Up to Its Name”, Deseret News, Oct. 18, 1992.
Besides the scientific report, I gave a public demonstration to conference participants on the effects of “quantum free energy warming and quantum free energy cooling” in the SmCo5 alloy with hydrogen gas under 10 atm pressure. Among others, on my demonstration was present one of the discoverers of the so-called “cold fusion of deuterium in palladium metal” – Martin Fleischmann. He highly appreciated my work.
Figure 1 shows the scheme of my experimental setup:
To date, no researcher has worked with the SmCo5 alloy except me. Decades later, some scientists claimed to get warming effects using the same SmCon magnets or Neodymium superstrong magnets. They didn’t mention observing the cooling effect. Maybe because they can’t explain this effect with ‘low-energy nuclear reactions’. Later, the term “Cold Fusion” was transformed into the term ‘Low Energy Nuclear Reactions’ (LENR) by the scientific community. Of course, they ‘forgot’ to mention that this is my discovery and that I claim that this phenomenon has nothing to do with nuclear reactions.
The structure of the SmCo5 alloy (produced by powder metallurgy) enables rapid, highly dense hydrogen gas storage within its crystal lattice. Notice: SmCo5 alloy samples in my experiments are not magnetized. The SmCo5 alloy sample shows a significant effect, with unusual super-fast rises and drops in temperature. For the second, the change of the sample’s temperature was tens of oC, plus or minus oC. See computer graphics of the experiment (performed in my lab in 1993). See Figure 2.
The initial temperature of the SmCo5 sample was room temperature (20 °C). After fast charging hydrogen gas into the SmCo5 sample, the temperature of the copper container rose to +50 °C almost immediately. After the inverse process of rapid discharge (with a rotary vacuum pump), the hydrogen gas temperature in the copper container dropped in a fraction of a second, well below the initial room temperature, to -35 °C. Total drop was 85 oC. The temperature of the SmCo5 alloy itself should be well above +50 °C (charging stage) and well below -35 °C. (discharging stage).
My investors invited one of the “inventors ‘of cold fusion of heavy hydrogen (deuterium) in Pd metal, Steve Johns, for advice. This man, a nuclear physicist, already disbelieved in the reality of deuterium fusion at low room temperature. He suggested that, in the SmC5 sample, a chemical reaction – hydration – occurs, generating heat. Steve Johns did not explain why the sample’s temperature dropped significantly below its initial room temperature, nor the mechanism of this ‘strange’ phenomenon. He just ignored this important fact. For him, and for other conventional scientists too, if energy is generated during hydrogen gas loading, the process is either chemical or nuclear. And because ordinary light hydrogen (used in my experiments) doesn’t make fusion, this process could be only chemical. But why do chemical reactions happen so fast (fraction of a second)? Chemical reactions happen, but hydration is not a chemical chain reaction – explosion? No answer to this question from professional experts like Steve Johns. My investors believed in this professional’s opinion and stopped investing. Later, in 2020, in my native country, Bulgaria, I decided to check the stability of a sample of neodymium alloy produced by powder metallurgy and used for superstrong magnets. Of course, I used a non-magnetized sample. The pressure of hydrogen gas was much higher, up to 100 atmospheres. As I expected, this alloy also generated a significant amount of energy (heat). However, almost immediately after the start of hydrogen gas loading, a cracking sound was heard (from outside the metal container), indicating the destruction of the neodymium alloy sample. The same happened in my early experiments with SmC5 alloy (in 1990-1991), but the SmCo5 sample was under much lower pressure (10 atm.). The SmCo5 sample withstood 4-6 cycles of hydrogen loading and de-loading without destruction. After that destruction happened, the rest of the SmCo5 sample was in a state of powder, and this powder doesn’t show thermal effects of ‘super dense quantum plasma’.
What happens in a solid body – receiver of ‘super dense quantum plasma’? In a regular non-quantum plasma, individual particles (ions or atomic nuclei) behave like independent units – each particle by itself. When, as a result of compression of hydrogen gas in metals (hydrogen in the crystalline lattice of metals is in the form of nuclei, i.e., in the form of ordinary plasma), the assembly of hydrogen nuclei is approaching the quantum boundary Rk,p. For some critical distance from Rk,p, this assembly becomes a quantum unit. All hydrogen nuclei cease to exist independently of each other and act as separate particles. This quantum unit is still a 3-dimensional plasma of individual particles. However, unlike in ordinary plasma, all particles (hydrogen nuclei) obey the collective will; they are synchronized. I call this, unknown by official academic science, a state of matter – super dense quantum plasma. To avoid crossing the quantum boundary Rk,p and becoming an undetermined material substance (which means a non-existence), the collective super dense quantum plasma is forced to follow this boundary closely without crossing it. The law of energy conservation is sacrificed! The temperature of the superdense quantum plasma increases when its density increases, and decreases (cooling) when its density decreases. This explains the cooling effect of SmCo5 at temperatures far below room temperature. The effect of quantum cooling disappears when superdense quantum plasma is destroyed. This happens when the density becomes too low during cooling or when the superdense plasma state is maintained for too long. See Figure 3.
As shown in Figure 3, in a high-density, superdense quantum plasma, small changes in density lead to large changes in temperature. In Earth’s conditions, the density of hydrogen nuclei in the core of Earth is high enough to provoke the formation of superdense quantum plasma and to heat its receiver’s iron-nickel core to the melting point. The Earth’s core is hot, liquid iron-nickel lava and a superdense quantum plasma of hydrogen. A big part of Earth’s mantle is heated to the melting point – lava. The SDQP keeps Earth’s core at a constant, high temperature, forever.
What triggers the changes in the density of SDQP, and by consequence, the temperature of the Earth’s bowels? Answer is: Anthropic Principle fulfilling the requirements of the Quantum Wave of Life’s Evolution!!! That is the right answer, believe it or not. Changes in Earth’s internal temperature facilitate the destruction of the old dominant species of life and the establishment of new, more progressive dominant species, or a new, more progressive type of human beings.
In stars, galaxy nuclei, quasars, and other massive cosmic bodies located far away from Earth, the anthropic principle is very weak, or zero. Changes of their density, and by consequence of their temperature/luminosity, of SDQP- bowels are random, due to high turbulence of material substance under very high temperatures. The slightest change in density causes a very big change in their temperature.
In 2022, we (my partner Georgi Stanchev and I) conducted a very important, groundbreaking (for physics) experiment. See Figure 4.
Both chambers of the high-pressure vessel were filled with seawater. Кълбовидната мълния was created in the lower chamber with the help of pulse discharge from high-voltage, high-energy storage capacitors. Almost immediately after discharge, something very unusual happened – high-pressure resisting sighting glass was destroyed, and from its hole erupted a high-speed jet of seawater illuminated by intense light coming out from the upper chamber. The only possible explanation for this event was: creation of superdense quantum plasma in the upper chamber (and, of course, in the lower chamber too) of the high-pressure vessel. Silicon membrane cannot be bent in the direction of the upper chamber, caused by pressure coming from the lower chamber (ball lightning destroys the space in the place of its appearance; as a result, pressure in the seawater increases considerably) because liquids are incompressible. But the membrane, anyway, is bent. When we opened the pressure vessel, we saw that the membrane was unharmed – no holes, no burnings. The same happened earlier in my experiments in Varna, Bulgaria (2012). The chamber filled with seawater was separated from the lab’s open-air space by a silicon temperature-resistant membrane. When ball lightning appeared in the chamber, the membrane bent considerably in the direction of the open air. The extra volume above the initial position of the membrane (before the creation of ball lightning) and the new bent position of the membrane were exactly equal to the volume of ball lightning’s nucleus, as expected by me. This experiment was another proof of the destruction of space at the site of ball lightning appearance and the formation of super-dense quantum plasma. In this case, air is a compressible substance, so the membrane bent outward from the chamber unobstructed. See figure 5 and some of my videos posted on the Internet.
To have the possibility to bend the membrane in the direction of the upper chamber filled with seawater, the liquid water must be transformed into a compressible material. That is plasma – super dense quantum plasma!!! See Figure 6.
After experiments with demagnetized magnet alloys, it became clear to me that the practical application of generating free quantum energy (heat or cold) in solid bodies is impossible because of the rapid destruction of solid bodies, the receivers of ‘super dense quantum plasma’. So, I decided to change the strategy: try a non-solid body receiver for super-dense quantum plasma, which cannot be destroyed once it is created. Or, to create conditions in a lab like in stars and in big enough planets like Earth.
In stars, and in other massive cosmic bodies (quasars, galaxy nuclei, …), gravity forces are so strong that they easily neutralize the pressure created by the супер-плътна квантова плазма and make the process of generating free energy continuous, without interruptions.
In Earth’s bowels, gravity is strong enough too, so there exist conditions for the permanent existence of super-dense quantum plasma.
The pillars of the officially accepted Standard Model of Cosmology are:
- Big Bang: the beginning of the Universe
- The creation and evolution of stars and galaxies are the result of the combined forces of gravity and nuclear reactions.
After unexpected JWST observations, some scientists are willing to sacrifice the first pillar of the Standard Model. Some say there was no Big Bang; others suggest there was, but it happened not 13.8 billion years ago but 27 billion years ago, or earlier. However, all official scientists and amateurs are willing to sacrifice the second pillar of the Standard Model. Because they have no slightest doubt that energy sources in the bowels of stars, galaxies, galaxy nuclei, quasars, and massive planets could be different than nuclear energy. As I explained in my earlier publications, there was no Big Bang beginning of the universe, there was no beginning at all, the universe is stationary, no changes in time, no evolution, it is not created by something or by someone, it exists in cycles (13.82 billion years), the same in all details. The reason for the existence of the universe is inside the cycle, not outside it. I also explained that the energy source that makes stars and other massive objects in the universe shine, keeps the core of our planet constantly hot and molten, is quantum free energy of the Super Dense Quantum Plasma!!!
Betelgeuse is a red supergiant star visible to the naked eye in the night sky. The distance to this supergiant star from the Sun is 400-600 light-years, and its diameter is 640-740 times that of the Sun. The luminosity of this giant is highly variable. For example, starting in October 2019, Betelgeuse began to dim noticeably. For a short time, Betelgeuse even disappeared from observation. Astronomers suggest that a smaller star-companion (with much smaller luminosity) dimmed it when passing over its disk. Such a companion, however, was never observed before. Pure speculation is this star-companion. Such large fluctuations of luminosity, and even to become invisible for observation for some short period of time, can be ONLY explained by fluctuations of the density of Super Dense Plasma in the bowels of Betelgeuse.
Край
